Some first impressions of the panel report, based on what I've read so far:
-- it has some very interesting issues.
-- it's very well-written.
-- it's very, very long.
More later.
ADDED:
When I say it's well-written, I don't mean to imply that it's an easy read. Rather, I mean that the Panel explained some difficult issues (the GATS claims in particular) as clearly as they can be explained.
MORE:
Here is a good Forbes op-ed from former AB Member Jim Bacchus. (The article explains that he was, "counsel to the China Copyright Alliance, the coalition of associations representing the American motion picture, sound recording and book publishing industries formed to provide legal support to the United States in its WTO copyright cases against China.")
